Barrosasaurus casamiquelai was a Late Cretaceous Patagonian titanosaur known from three dorsal vertebrae. Few bones survive, but they come from one horizon, represent different regions of the back and preserve comparable anatomy. The genus is recognised by neural-arch laminae, not an estimated size.
Quick facts
| Scientific name | Barrosasaurus casamiquelai Salgado & Coria, 2009 |
|---|---|
| Group | Sauropoda, Titanosauria |
| Age | Late Cretaceous, early Campanian |
| Range | Sierra Barrosa, Neuquén Province, Argentina |
| Formation | Anacleto Formation |
| Holotype | MCF-PVPH-447 |
| Material | Three incomplete dorsal vertebrae |
| Size | Large, exact length and mass unknown |
| Diet | Herbivorous by sauropod identity |
| Main limit | No skull, limbs or complete vertebral series |
What can three bones establish?
The three large vertebrae came from the same red river sandstone horizon.
Bony sheets around the neural arch change predictably along the back and preserve diagnostic combinations.
The narrower family and closest relative remain less certain because most characters are missing.
Length, mass, skull, limbs, skin and feeding height cannot be measured from the holotype.
Discovery at Sierra Barrosa
Leonardo Salgado and Rodolfo Coria named the genus in 2009. The holotype, MCF-PVPH-447, is held at the Carmen Funes Museum in Plaza Huincul. It consists of three large incomplete vertebrae interpreted as approximately the third, the seventh or eighth, and the ninth or tenth dorsals.
The bones were found together in one horizon of reddish fluvial sandstone at Sierra Barrosa in Neuquén Province. The rocks belong to the Anacleto Formation and date to the early Campanian stage of the Late Cretaceous. The genus name records Sierra Barrosa, while the species honours Argentine researcher Rodolfo Casamiquela.
Vertebrae as an anatomical identity card
Sauropod neural arches and their tall spines are braced by systems of thin bony plates called laminae. Their positions change along the back, so the authors first estimated where each fossil belonged by comparing it with more complete titanosaur vertebral series.
The anterior vertebra bears strong sheets linking the neural spine with the front articular processes. Paired spinodiapophyseal laminae occur on the two posterior bones, with the anterior branch stronger than the posterior one. On the rearmost vertebra that branch divides again. An unusually long portion of neural spine rises above the lateral wing-like processes. This combination, rather than size by itself, separated the holotype from other known titanosaurs.
Systematic position
The original description securely assigned Barrosasaurus to Titanosauria. Three vertebrae do not preserve enough characters to test every narrower branch, so a particular family or closest relative should not be presented as settled. Laminae may also vary both along one animal’s back and through growth.
Patagonia contains many other sauropods, but geographic proximity does not establish identity or ancestry. Barrosasaurus is not simply a juvenile of a larger named genus, and similarity to a distant titanosaur cannot override the diagnostic bones and geological age.
What three bones cannot reveal
The vertebrae are large, but no complete spine or limb bones are known. Total length and body mass have therefore not been measured. Even the positions of the three vertebrae are given as ranges, while the neck, tail and trunk proportions in a life restoration necessarily borrow the general titanosaur plan.
Teeth, jaws and gut contents are absent. Herbivory follows from sauropod relationships, but particular plants and feeding height cannot be identified. No skin, osteoderms, eggs or trackway can presently be connected with the genus.
The Anacleto environment
Red sandstones record a terrestrial river system. The broader Anacleto Formation preserves dinosaurs, crocodyliforms and turtles, while Auca Mahuevo is famous for titanosaur eggs. Those eggs cannot be assigned to Barrosasaurus unless embryos preserve anatomical features diagnostic of the genus.
The three vertebrae remain valuable evidence for early Campanian titanosaur diversity. They show how a small sample can be informative when it comes from a clear geological context and carries features that can be compared across the skeletons of related animals. Nullotitan illustrates a better-limbed but still incomplete Patagonian titanosaur. Both profiles show why “large” is not a precise body measurement.
Evidence, inference and reconstruction
| Level | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Direct | Three large dorsal vertebrae with distinctive laminae from one horizon |
| Supported | Titanosaur identity and herbivorous sauropod body plan |
| Uncertain | Exact vertebral positions, narrower relationships and total body size |
| Unknown | Head, limbs, food plants, skin, armour, eggs and behaviour |
Frequently asked questions
How many bones are known?
Three incomplete but well-preserved dorsal vertebrae from one individual.
Where did it live?
In river environments of the Anacleto Formation at Sierra Barrosa in Argentina.
Why were three vertebrae enough to name it?
They preserve a distinctive comparable combination of neural-arch laminae and neural-spine structure.
Was Barrosasaurus a giant?
The bones are large, but without limbs and a complete spine its length and mass cannot be calculated reliably.

