Prejanopterus: a pterosaur from Early Cretaceous Spain

Several animals left scattered bones near Préjano; a re-study changed how their long snouts are understood.

Artistic small long-snouted pterosaur beside a coastal lake
A speculative life scene based on a fragmentary fossil assemblage. Body colours, exact behaviour and wing pose are not preserved.

Fossils from Fuente Amarga near Préjano in Spain include partial jaws and other separated bones of several pterosaurs. Three adjoining snout fragments, catalogued as FA 112, define Prejanopterus curvirostris. They document the front of the head but cannot reveal the entire living animal. The cover is an artistic interpretation, not a fossil photograph.

Quick facts

Named speciesPrejanopterus curvirostris, Fuentes Vidarte and Meijide Calvo, 2010
HolotypeFA 112, three adjoining rostrum fragments
Additional snoutFA 185; six preserved teeth
LocalityFuente Amarga near Préjano, La Rioja, Spain
Rock unit and ageLeza Formation, Early Cretaceous; exact age debated
Estimated wingspanAbout 1.5–2 m in an adult, by comparison
Key featureLong toothed rostrum with a short toothless tip
Evidence guide

What can the fossils tell us?

A partial snout, not a skull

FA 112 preserves around 140 mm of rostrum. The back of the skull and soft tissues are not known from it.

Discovery and collection

The Fuente Amarga fossil locality was discovered in 1980 by Blaschke, Palacios and Pérez-Lorente, and excavated systematically in 1993–1994. The 2010 description named a pterosaur from the long snout FA 112 and associated other scattered material from the site. Fossils preserved apart cannot simply be assembled into a complete individual.

A later reassessment recognised at least five individuals from overlapping jaw elements. That is a minimum count of animals, not the number of inventoried fragments. The material is held at the palaeontological centre in Enciso. Multiple jaws and separate limb bones explain why a single complete body cannot be reconstructed directly.

Snout, teeth and corrected name

FA 112 preserves about 140 mm of anterior rostrum with at least 19 pairs of tooth sockets and a short toothless tip. A second snout, FA 185, retains six teeth. These are direct dental observations, not proof of a particular prey item or feeding behaviour.

The original account treated a sideways bend in the snout as natural and used the epithet curvirostra. A 2012 reassessment concluded that the lateral bend resulted from fossil deformation, and corrected the species spelling to curvirostris. A slight upward curve in profile and a distorted sideways bend are distinct points.

Illustrative researchers studying disarticulated pterosaur fossils
A fictional laboratory scene, not a photograph of FA 112, FA 185, the real researchers or their collection.

Age, size and relationships

The fossils come from the Leza Formation of La Rioja. One stratigraphic interpretation assigns it to the late Barremian–early Aptian, while another places it in the Berriasian–Valanginian. Stating a narrow age without acknowledging that conflict would suggest a certainty the rocks do not provide.

The 2012 authors estimated an adult wingspan of roughly 1.5–2 m by comparing incomplete elements. This is not a measurement of a spread fossil wing, and parts from the locality may represent different individuals. Prejanopterus has been discussed among early pterodactyloids. Petrodactyle and Cycnorhamphus offer anatomical comparisons, not missing pieces of this Spanish fossil.

Artistic long-snouted pterosaur flying above a lake
The flight pose and setting are interpretive; the fossils do not establish living colours or a measured wingspan.

Illustration and evidence

A reconstructed animal beside a coastal lake evokes one plausible setting, while the laboratory scene explains why researchers must compare disarticulated pieces. Neither illustration depicts FA 112, FA 185, actual scientists or an observed flight. They cannot establish the animal's colour, precise prey or behaviour.

Frequently asked questions

How many individuals were found at Fuente Amarga?

At least five were distinguished in the reassessment from overlapping jaw elements. The number of separate bones is much larger.

Was the snout naturally bent sideways?

The later study attributed the conspicuous lateral bend to post-burial distortion, not the usual living form.

Why is the fossil's age uncertain?

The Leza Formation has been placed in different Early Cretaceous intervals in competing stratigraphic schemes.

Is the 1.5–2 m wingspan measured directly?

No. It is a comparative adult estimate from incomplete bones, not a preserved fully extended wing.